Stride Conductor vs Copilot

Stride’s Rob O’Brien and Stephen Meriwether join this week’s conversation highlighting the impact of AI on software development. The duo demonstrates how Stride Conductor, a multi-agent GenAI tool, differs from single-user CodeGen tools like GitHub Copilot by offering tailored solutions for team-based workflows.

‍

Unlike cloud-based tools, Stride Conductor operates within a secure company environment, offering complete control over AI model usage. It also supports team-specific customization, ensuring code aligns with established standards, reducing mental overhead, and improving code consistency across large organizations.

‍

In a live demo, Stephen contrasts Copilot's single-user model with Stride Conductor’s automated testing capabilities. While Copilot requires frequent manual interventions, Stride Conductor completes tests with a single command, showcasing its efficiency in collaborative environments. 

‍

Stride Conductor is currently supporting Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python.

Visit https://www.strideconductor.com/ to sign up for a live demo.

‍

“When we talk about Stride Conductor, we think of three key differentiators: secure, tailored, and automated. This is not a cloud-based SaaS product; it’s running in your environment.” ~ Rob O’Brien

‍

In This Episode:

• What makes Stride Conductor different?
• Demo preview: using Copilot vs. Stride Conductor for testing
• Using Stride Conductor for testing
• Addressing unique use cases with Stride Conductor
• How to book a Stride Conductor live demo